Your remedies, recorded in your words, on WhatsApp.

Send Sanko a voice note, a message or a photo of your notebook. It keeps a private record of each remedy with your name on it.

A WhatsApp-style chat. A practitioner sends a 24-second voice note about a fever remedy. Sanko lists the two plants, the amounts, the preparation and the dose, and asks: Have I got that right? The practitioner replies: Yes, that is correct. Save it.
Real Sanko agent replies to a voice-note transcript, run on a local model with a fictional practitioner.

It starts with a voice note.

Practitioners already record what they do: spoken into a phone, written down, or kept in a book they have had for years. Sanko works with all three inside WhatsApp, so there is nothing to install and no new interface to learn.

A practitioner at a wooden table writes in a notebook while holding a phone, beside dried leaves, roots and amber jars.
Keep your notebook. Sanko keeps a structured record of what you send, private to your practice and in your name.
  1. Capture

    The practitioner sends a voice note in their own language, a typed message, or a photograph of a page. It reaches the Sanko agent as an ordinary WhatsApp message.

  2. Structure

    Sanko pulls out the plants, parts, preparation, doses and indications. Local names resolve to botanical ones, and the local name stays the one on the record.

  3. Follow

    The practitioner says who they treated, with what, and for how long. Sanko asks that patient for consent, then checks in on day three, day seven and onward. The patient replies to the agent.

  4. Accumulate

    Each episode goes onto the same formulation’s record. Where consent allows, that record becomes something a research team can work from.

A documented history takes years to build.

A single record is a note. What makes it worth anything is the hundredth entry against the same formulation, years later, with every source still named. That is the timescale Sanko is built for.

formulation 024 — first entry 0:34
“Ewe dongoyaro — ewé àti èpo igi.” yoruba — “neem leaf: the leaves and the bark”
local name
Ewe dongoyaro
botanical
Azadirachta indica
parts used
leaf, bark
attributed to
the practitioner, by name
visibility
private to their practice

One of 442 plant names Sanko can resolve today.

Day one of a formulation’s record: one voice note, structured and attributed. The plant-name count is live.
  • A shortlist for researchers

    Documented use does not show that a formulation works. It does show a research team which formulations have been used often enough, and recorded carefully enough, to be worth studying properly.

  • Aggregation needs permission

    Anything aggregated runs on consented, de-identified records. The practitioners behind a formulation stay named on it, and stay in control of it.

  • Worth most in ten years

    A formulation documented today is most useful a decade from now, so the consent, attribution and correction models are the parts being settled first.

The same records, read four ways.

Sanko makes practitioner records legible to an organisation while the practitioner’s name stays attached to them.

The formulation owner’s WhatsApp. Sanko warns that a PDF sent to the phone can be kept or forwarded and cannot be recalled, then delivers the released evidence report as a 4-page PDF.
The owner asks for a review in WhatsApp and gets the released brief as a PDF, after a warning that a sent copy cannot be recalled.
Page 1 of the evidence report. A control record lists the formulation, request reference, report version, independent review, source currency and signed manifest. The brief below it is labelled literature synthesis, not certification or proof of efficacy, and each section reads: Not assessed.
Page 1 of the 4-page report. On fictional records every section reads “Not assessed”: the brief says what the evidence could not establish.

Requested and delivered through Sanko’s guided WhatsApp flow. Fictional analyst, reviewer and release staff ran the steps in between. Preview: not yet released.

  • Traditional medicine organisations

    Strengthen how members document their work, and keep local naming systems in place while doing it.

  • Research teams

    Work from structured records that still carry the practitioner, the language and the context they came from.

  • NGOs and funders

    See what a programme is producing, in aggregate and de-identified.

  • Regulators and public bodies

    Review how knowledge is documented, consented to and attributed, with the limits of that documentation stated on the record.

Every record carries its source.

Attribution and consent are fields on the record, written at the moment of capture. Any later use of that record can be traced back to the practitioner it came from.

  • Run on Sanko’s own machines

    Transcription, page reading and extraction run on models Sanko operates itself, so practitioner and patient content does not have to be handed to a third-party AI service to be read.

  • Scoped to the practitioner

    A practitioner sees their own records and nobody else’s. Patient tracking documents what was reported; it is not a measure of whether a treatment works.

  • Nagoya-aligned

    Records carry the source attribution and provenance that access and benefit-sharing agreements under the Nagoya Protocol depend on. Sanko follows those principles; it does not certify compliance with them.

Sanko is in private testing.

The agent only answers approved numbers while we test with a small group. Apply with the WhatsApp number you would use, and the agent messages you once it has been approved.

We read every application before granting access, so expect a short wait. Form delivery is not connected in this preview.

Your number is used only to add you to the test and to message you from the Sanko agent. It is not shared, and you can ask us to remove it at any time. How we handle it.

Sanko agent · practitioner illustrative

Ẹ káàbọ̀. Send a voice note, message or photo to start a private record.

0:34

I heard “ewe dongoyaro”. Is that Azadirachta indica?

Yes

Saved to your records as formulation 024. Only you can see it.

Tell us what you need it to do.

Whether you are documenting a practitioner network, funding one, researching what it produces or regulating it, start with the problem and the people it affects.

Form delivery is not connected in this preview.

Apply to test